Before anyone relies on a construction-finance figure, show the evidence behind it.
An evidence layer for owner-side development, construction-finance and project-controls teams.
Trace figures, conditions, dates and source pages before a commitment is relied on. Pactbeam runs deterministic Closure on a stated date and surfaces the Unclosed Delta — or says Cannot Infer. The accountable person still decides.
Closure Workbench · funds-availability-v1
Synthetic demoEvidence set · 80-page packet
Every figure carries a source hash, a physical page and a verbatim quote. No locator, no result.
Closure inputs · deterministic, no model call
A · Full packet
All four pages present, on the evidenced observation date.
Explore manually
Unclosed Delta TWD 20.0M
Unclosed deltaThe figure carried forward is not supported by the evidence on this date. The difference is reported as an Unclosed Delta with its locators.
- C-01Facility decompositionClosedTWD 80.0M + TWD 20.0M = TWD 100.0M
- C-02Conditionality at the observation dateClosedCondition (start-of-construction certificate) recorded as not obtained on 2025-02-10. Supported availability = TWD 100.0M − TWD 20.0M = TWD 80.0M
- C-03Stated availability against supported availabilityUnclosed deltaStated TWD 100.0M − supported TWD 80.0M = TWD 20.0M
What this run cannot infer (3)
- Whether a document later than p.34 supersedes the availability statement. The evidence set carries no supersession record.
- Whether the drawdown-conditions schedule (p.58) was later amended. The page carries no effective date of its own.
- Whether the packet is complete. Closure runs on the evidence placed in front of it; it cannot observe a document that was never supplied.
This is an evidence observation, not a credit, payment, legal or engineering conclusion. A named person decides. Full proof record.
02The question
A figure can be located, arithmetically consistent, and still unsupported on the observation date.
That third property lives across documents, dates and conditions rather than on any single page. The two paths below do the same review; they differ in what remains available for re-checking.
03Three product principles
One system, three commitments.
Evidence Locator
Every material figure resolves to a source-file sha256, a physical page and a verbatim quote. No locator, no result.
Closure
A fixed check over located evidence: no model call, no network, no clock. Same inputs and date, same outcome.
Cannot Infer
When required material is absent, the system stops and asks the smallest question that would resolve it.
The accountable person decides
Nothing here confirms a field, releases funds or concludes. Software reconciles; a named person confirms and decides.
04Demo scope
A live synthetic case
This workbench demonstrates the evidence path with synthetic documents. The full case identity and limits are recorded once on the proof page.
05One bounded case
Start with one funding-commitment window.
A small, written scope makes the work useful without asking a first counterparty to adopt a platform.
- 01One evidence question — One funding-commitment window, not a platform rollout.
- 02One observation date — Every figure is checked as of that date.
- 03One admissible document set — Agreed before reading; nothing outside it enters the result.
- 04One inspectable Packet — Locators, unclosed deltas, cannot-infer items and follow-up questions.
- 05One named decision owner — The Packet informs the person; it never releases, certifies or pays.
First agree the question, date and admissible documents. Then replay the evidence and deliver the Packet.